Nike
Apparel
Published report · incomplete scoring evidence
This edition records the findings that can be supported and leaves the remaining indicators unrated. An overall score requires all fifteen indicators; unrated does not mean zero.
A quantified historical injury reduction strengthens vitality. The separate licensed-apparel dismissal case and not-yet-confirmed remedy commitments make agency and security mixed. The offsetting dimension changes leave the overall score unchanged.
Scope: NIKE, Inc. strategic supplier programme cohorts, plus the specified Hoosier Manufacturing factory producing Nike-branded collegiate apparel through licensee Fanatics. The Hoosier case is not presented as representative of all strategic suppliers.
Scope, period & review disclosure
What this score covers
NIKE, Inc. strategic supplier programme cohorts, plus the specified Hoosier Manufacturing factory producing Nike-branded collegiate apparel through licensee Fanatics. The Hoosier case is not presented as representative of all strategic suppliers.
Historical FY2024 supplier data, FY2025 training and dismissals, and August 2026 remedy commitments; reviewed 14 September 2026 Indicator reassessment: 15 September 2026; earlier observation periods are retained.
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.1. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Three evidence indicators
Connection
Not scored1 supporting source
Vitality
Not scored1 supporting source
Security
Not scoredAgency
Not scoredHow the total is calculated
Reported wellbeing and life experienceNot scored
Workload and recoveryNot scored
Access to effective support60/100
Belonging and inclusion60/100
Relationships and peer supportNot scored
Fair treatment and discriminationNot scored
Occupational safety80/100
Physical and mental healthNot scored
Prevention and working conditionsNot scored
Pay and material adequacy40/100
Benefits and income protectionNot scored
Employment stabilityNot scored
Voice and representation40/100
Learning and progression60/100
Autonomy and informed choiceNot scored
No overall score is calculated while any indicator remains unrated. Missing evidence is never averaged away or counted as zero.
BEYOND THE SCORECARD
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Nike’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
Explore reports & pricing →
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
FY2024 remains the latest dataset identified by Nike’s current sustainability-data hub; retained injury evidence is historical and does not describe current injury rates. Nike defines its supplier metrics. Hoosier produces licensed Nike apparel through Fanatics and is not confirmed as part of the strategic-supplier measurement cohort. WRC is an independent labor monitor with its own university-code standard; court appeals and the factory’s position are retained. FLA membership is not assurance about every worker. This edition assesses fifteen distinct indicators. Sources do not establish every indicator; incomplete dimensions and the overall total remain unrated. Different populations within the report are identified in individual findings and must not be treated as interchangeable.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Nike: responsible supply chain ↗
Company disclosure
Why this source is included: Retained for the explicitly historical FY2024 supplier-programme and safety cohort because the current Nike sustainability-data hub still identifies FY2024 as its latest dataset. The 2025 training update is implementation context, not a renewed injury observation.
- Fair Labor Association: Nike membership and assessment record ↗
External benchmark
- Nike: worker voice and engagement programme ↗
Company disclosure
Why this source is included: FY2024 programme data remains the latest disclosed dataset, retained to describe implemented worker-survey and action-planning systems, not a current wellbeing outcome.
- Nike: supplier health and safety detail ↗
Company disclosure
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Nike & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.