Unilever
Consumer goods
This edition records the findings that can be supported and leaves the remaining indicators unrated. An overall score requires all fifteen indicators; unrated does not mean zero.
A reported employee-experience measure adds outcome evidence. Listening, health and development programmes operate, while restructuring and uneven economic protection keep security mixed.
Scope: Unilever continuing operations and selected employee, supplier and product-safety processes; the demerged ice-cream business is excluded.
Scope, period & review disclosure
Unilever continuing operations and selected employee, supplier and product-safety processes; the demerged ice-cream business is excluded.
2025 continuing-operations workforce evidence; reviewed 14 September 2026. Indicator reassessment: 15 September 2026; earlier observation periods are retained.
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.1. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Connection
Not scoredVitality
Not scored1 supporting source
Security
Not scored1 supporting source
Agency
Not scored1 supporting source
How the total is calculated
No overall score is calculated while any indicator remains unrated. Missing evidence is never averaged away or counted as zero.
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Unilever’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
Survey results are company-reported proxies, not happiness or causation. Discrimination incidents and pending cases do not establish their severity, prevalence or unresolved duration; general investigation procedures are not verified individual remedies. Restructuring, protection gaps and supplier wage promises remain limitations. Ice Cream changes the 2024 safety comparison. This edition assesses fifteen distinct indicators. Sources do not establish every indicator; incomplete dimensions and the overall total remain unrated. Different populations within the report are identified in individual findings and must not be treated as interchangeable.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Unilever: 2025 Annual Report and Accounts ↗
Company disclosure
- IUF: Unilever joint agreement archive ↗
Worker or union source
Source relationship: IUF is a signatory and worker-advocacy organisation; the archived commitment is not a current implementation audit.
Why this source is included: The 2016 agreement is retained as a historical commitment and contrasted with 2025 incident disclosures, not as proof of current compliance.
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
52/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
52/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Unilever & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.