Disney
Entertainment
This edition needs external evidence review.
This edition is retained for its evidence history and is not included in current rankings.
Read the latest edition →Employee support and development are documented, alongside a favourable company-reported parks injury comparison. A children’s privacy settlement limits the security assessment.
Scope: The Walt Disney Company; eligible employees, U.S. parks guests and named Disney entities’ children-directed YouTube content.
Scope, period & review disclosure
What this score covers
The Walt Disney Company; eligible employees, U.S. parks guests and named Disney entities’ children-directed YouTube content.
FY2025 report and December 2025 FTC order; reviewed September 2026
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.0. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Program or practice in place
Connection
60/1001 supporting source
Vitality
80/1001 supporting source
Security
40/1001 supporting source
Agency
60/1001 supporting source
How the total is calculated
(60/100 + 60/100 + 80/100 + 40/100 + 60/100) ÷ 5 = 60/100
Each dimension carries 20% of the total.
BEYOND THE SCORECARD
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Disney’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
Explore reports & pricing →
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
Employee, park and online-content populations differ. Disney reports the parks comparison; the FTC settlement concerns specified YouTube practices, not all Disney products or current conduct.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Disney: 2025 Sustainability & Social Impact Report ↗
Company disclosure
- FTC: Disney case and court-approved order ↗
Regulator or public authority
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
68/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Reviewed · Previous edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Disney & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.