IKEA
Home & furniture
This edition needs external evidence review.
This edition is retained for its evidence history and is not included in current rankings.
Read the latest edition →Inter IKEA documents workforce engagement, safety programmes and learning. Its separate corporate scope is essential when interpreting an IKEA-branded rating.
Scope: Inter IKEA Group and its stated workforce and supplier processes. Separately owned franchisees, including Ingka, are not treated as the same employer.
Scope, period & review disclosure
What this score covers
Inter IKEA Group and its stated workforce and supplier processes. Separately owned franchisees, including Ingka, are not treated as the same employer.
FY2025 Sustainability Statement; reviewed September 2026
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.0. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Documented commitment
Connection
60/1001 supporting source
Vitality
60/1001 supporting source
Security
60/1001 supporting source
Agency
60/1001 supporting source
How the total is calculated
(40/100 + 60/100 + 60/100 + 60/100 + 60/100) ÷ 5 = 56/100
Each dimension carries 20% of the total.
BEYOND THE SCORECARD
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind IKEA’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
Explore reports & pricing →
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
Inter IKEA states that this report was not independently assured. It does not cover every IKEA franchise employee. Public surveys of life at home cannot establish that IKEA causes wellbeing.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Inter IKEA Group: FY2025 Sustainability Statement ↗
Company disclosure
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
48/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Reviewed · Previous edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About IKEA & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.