Starbucks
Restaurants
This edition needs external evidence review.
This edition is retained for its evidence history and is not included in current rankings.
Read the latest edition →The FY2025 report supports operating employee benefits, education and community programmes. Current appellate decisions add material, mixed evidence on worker voice, limiting agency despite verified degree completions.
Scope: Starbucks eligible U.S. partners, specified Buffalo and New York Roastery labor cases, and selected global community and farmer programmes; licensed-store benefits can differ.
Scope, period & review disclosure
What this score covers
Starbucks eligible U.S. partners, specified Buffalo and New York Roastery labor cases, and selected global community and farmer programmes; licensed-store benefits can differ.
FY2025 company disclosures and September 2026 appellate decisions concerning earlier conduct; reviewed 14 September 2026
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.0. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Program or practice in place
Connection
60/1001 supporting source
Vitality
60/1001 supporting source
Security
60/1001 supporting source
Agency
40/100How the total is calculated
(60/100 + 60/100 + 60/100 + 60/100 + 40/100) ÷ 5 = 56/100
Each dimension carries 20% of the total.
BEYOND THE SCORECARD
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Starbucks’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
Explore reports & pricing →
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
Benefits depend on eligibility, and company reporting covers distinct populations. The court decisions concern specified locations and earlier conduct, not all stores or a measured current prevalence. Both adverse findings and successful appeals are retained. Remedy orders do not establish completed remediation. No comprehensive labor-relations audit or independent human research review was performed.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Starbucks: FY2025 Global Impact Report, benefits and education ↗
Company disclosure
- Starbucks: FY2025 Global Impact Report highlights ↗
Company disclosure
- Fifth Circuit: Starbucks labor case, No. 24-60650 ↗
Regulator or public authority
- Second Circuit: Siren Retail v. NLRB, No. 24-3168 ↗
Regulator or public authority
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
56/100Reviewed · Previous edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
64/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
64/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Starbucks & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.