Toyota
Automotive
This edition needs external evidence review.
This edition is retained for its evidence history and is not included in current rankings.
Read the latest edition →Measured employee survey improvements coexist with worsening injury rates and a historical certification-control failure. Updated evidence changes the dimension balance while the overall score remains 60.
Scope: Toyota Motor Corporation employee surveys; stated TMC and 53 overseas safety locations; selected Toyota/Lexus product-quality practices. Each finding uses its named population, not every affiliate or vehicle.
Scope, period & review disclosure
What this score covers
Toyota Motor Corporation employee surveys; stated TMC and 53 overseas safety locations; selected Toyota/Lexus product-quality practices. Each finding uses its named population, not every affiliate or vehicle.
June 2026 Sustainability Data Book: workforce outcomes FY 2025, accidents calendar 2024/FY 2025 and quality systems FY 2026; July 2024 certification finding retained with response context
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.0. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Reported outcome
Connection
80/1001 supporting source
Vitality
40/1001 supporting source
Security
40/100Agency
60/1001 supporting source
How the total is calculated
(80/100 + 80/100 + 40/100 + 40/100 + 60/100) ÷ 5 = 60/100
Each dimension carries 20% of the total.
BEYOND THE SCORECARD
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Toyota’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
Explore reports & pricing →
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
Survey responses are company-reported; life satisfaction remained average-range and below its comparator. Fiscal years, calendar years and populations differ. The 2024 certification finding is historical and accompanied by conformity checks and response; it does not show all Toyota vehicles are unsafe. Hino and other affiliates are not automatically included.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Toyota: June 2026 Sustainability Data Book ↗
Company disclosure
- Japan MLIT: Toyota certification misconduct, corrective order and conformity findings ↗
Regulator or public authority
Why this source is included: The finding directly concerns the product-quality controls credited by this assessment and was absent from its predecessor. It is retained with MLIT’s conformity/shipping-relief findings and the June 2026 book’s corrective quality activity, not as evidence of a current blanket vehicle hazard.
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Reviewed · Previous edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Toyota & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.