Target
Retail & groceries
This edition records the findings that can be supported and leaves the remaining indicators unrated. An overall score requires all fifteen indicators; unrated does not mean zero.
The September 2026 report adds defined pay and completed-education outcomes to the employee-benefit evidence. Mental-health and medical access, and community volunteering, remain implementation evidence rather than measured wellbeing, health or belonging outcomes.
Scope: Target U.S. team members and selected community programmes; benefit eligibility varies by role and hours. Supply-chain workers are not the population for the pay and graduation measures.
Scope, period & review disclosure
Target U.S. team members and selected community programmes; benefit eligibility varies by role and hours. Supply-chain workers are not the population for the pay and graduation measures.
FY2025 results in the September 2026 report and current benefits; reviewed 14 September 2026 Indicator reassessment: 15 September 2026; earlier observation periods are retained.
This AI-assisted assessment covers selected public evidence. It does not directly measure happiness or every effect the company has on people. How scoring and reviews work →
Published under HAPPYWorth scoring standard v1.1. No independent human research review is recorded.
Your free scorecard.
Each dimension carries 20% of the total. The score and supporting sources are free. Unlock the report for the full written analysis.
Connection
Not scored1 supporting source
Vitality
Not scoredSecurity
Not scoredAgency
Not scoredHow the total is calculated
No overall score is calculated while any indicator remains unrated. Missing evidence is never averaged away or counted as zero.
The score is a starting point.
A report brings together the detailed findings behind Target’s score, with a dated edition you can keep and refer to.
- Written interpretation across all five dimensions
- Evidence references and context in one report
- A downloadable edition for personal or internal use
This scorecard’s report edition is not currently available to buy.
See a fictional sample ↗Limits and confidence.
These are company-reported outcomes in the stated U.S. populations. Cumulative graduates do not establish equal access, subsequent earnings or causal benefits. Average nominal hourly pay does not establish living-wage adequacy. Eligibility and take-up vary, and suppliers are outside these employee measures. This edition assesses fifteen distinct indicators. Sources do not establish every indicator; incomplete dimensions and the overall total remain unrated. Different populations within the report are identified in individual findings and must not be treated as interchangeable.
- No independent human research review.
- Contrary-evidence search was targeted, not systematic.
- Some evidence is historical or its observation date is not established.
- Fewer than three dimensions have independent evidence.
Compare similar populations, activities and periods. This review may miss harm that was not identified in the sources.
Sources you can inspect.
- Target: employee pay and benefits ↗
Company disclosure
- Target: 2026 Sustainability and Governance Report, pp. 2, 53–55 ↗
Company disclosure
- Great Place To Work: Target employee survey profile ↗
External benchmark
Source relationship: The provider sells employer survey and certification services. The response denominator and survey fieldwork dates are not published on this profile.
Score history.
Previous scores, review dates and source references stay public. Detailed edition notes belong to the full report; a purchase covers only the edition selected.
Sep 15, 2026
Not scoredReviewed · Latest edition
This scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
68/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Reviewed · Previous edition
View scorecard →Sep 14, 2026
60/100Published · Previous edition
View scorecard →About Target & company profile
This company has not added a profile description yet.
Company-supplied profile information does not control independent scores.